PendiumPendium

Step 1 of 8

Sea to Table is a top-tier recommendation for US-caught fish, but competitors are winning the 'subscription' volume.

We analyzed your catalog of 34 products against thousands of buyer prompts. Here is where the signal is strong and where competitors are currently out-mentioning you.

Sea to Table's baseline score
48/100
ModerateCatalog connected · 34 products

Sea to Table maintains a respectable visibility score of 48/100, bolstered by strong editorial trust and a clear brand identity around US-only wild catches. However, it faces stiff competition from subscription-native giants like Wild Alaskan Company. To win, the brand must dominate 'traceability' and 'domestic sourcing' queries where AI agents are currently looking for a tie-breaker.

What we see
  • Sea to Table has excellent editorial presence in 'Best Of' lists (CNET, Business Insider), which drives visibility in ChatGPT and Claude.
  • The brand is frequently compared to Wild Alaskan Company and Vital Choice in Reddit threads, a key source for Gemini and AI Overviews.
  • There is a visibility gap in 'recipe-first' queries where AI agents recommend grocery stores rather than DTC delivery services.
  • YouTube coverage for Sea to Table is present but less dense than ButcherBox, limiting Gemini's video-driven recommendations.
  • Trust signals like 'DNA testing' and 'B Corp' are frequently cited by AI agents as reasons for recommendation.
Business goals Sea to Table is likely trying to hit
  • Scale the 'Oh-My Omega' and 'Pescatarian' subscription box segments
  • Recapture market share from consolidated meat+seafood giants like ButcherBox
  • Expand the corporate gifting and 'Grill Master' seasonal kits revenue
  • Counteract historical supply chain controversy with real-time traceability content
  • Optimize logistics to reduce shipping costs for one-time orders below $99